Three low-performing Queens high schools find themselves on the chopping block, including one school that was voted to close last year.
Twenty-four struggling schools are currently being considered for closure by the Department of Education (DOE) after poor performances and low grades on city progress reports. Borough institutions Business, Computer Applications & Entrepreneurship High School, Law, Government and Community Service High School and Flushing High School, which narrowly avoided closing last year, were included on the shortlist.
Earlier this year the city released a list of 36 elementary and middle schools that also face closure.
“These are difficult but important conversations to have to ensure that we are holding our schools to the highest of standards,” said Deputy Chancellor Marc Sternberg.
This is the second time in the past year Flushing faces the ax. In April, the Panel for Educational Policy voted to close 24 schools – seven in Queens – through a process called turnaround. The closures were later overruled when the United Federation of Teachers won a court challenge saving Flushing and the 23 other schools.
The current list of two dozen high schools may be whittled down as the DOE continues their evaluations.
“We’ll take the feedback that we receive from the school and community into consideration as we explore options to improve performance and support student success, and we will continue to work with all of our schools to ensure that students have access to high quality options,” Sternberg said.
Inclusion on this year’s list was based on past performance, quality reviews and progress reports, which the DOE released Monday.
Overall, Queens schools fared better on the reports this year earning nine more A’s and B’s than last year. No schools received an F and only five received D’s, including the three schools that may be forced to close their doors.
Grades on the sixth annual progress reports were based on standardized test performance, students attendance, progress toward graduation and parent, teacher and student surveys.
“By measuring how well our schools prepare students for college and careers, the Progress Reports shine a light on the importance of increased rigor as a bridge to future success,” said Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott.
*Schools without grades are closing or did not have enough data to receive them.


Here’s a hint from someone who taught at one of those schools for close to 20 years. When the city wants to close you down simply to institute something new in the building…. they first throw at you all the worst students in the region. Then they wait. What can we do with out-of-control, ignorant thugs that have zero interest in education. Nothing. So they take the school’s ranking down and viola! School is closed per the city’s desire and plan. To implement some new concept that will get be used for PR purposes. Then the former non-performing students will be dispersed to other places and the city will throw the best students at the new “school” to inhabit the building…. and the claim that the reorganization was a success.
Keep the hardworking teachers. Get rid of Flushing HS principal Magdalen Radovich. She’s good at window dressing, to mask her INCOMPETENCE!
What happens if it turns out that the bad schools simply have poor students, and the replacement schools can not do any better?
Does anyone believe that the quality of the students in every neighborhood are the same?
Is it possible that the students are as important as the teachers in determining performance?
Does “increased rigor” make students smarter? Or just more pliable?
You’ve got it Dana. How can Flushing succeed when it keeps admitting low level students. Most of the students who go there are 1s and 2s. How can a D school attract high level students? This last progress report will only dig us deeper into the hole.